Collection (First Edition Only): Solitary Travelers
First Published: 14th March, 2016
Genre: Science Fiction Romance / Novella
Available: Amazon.com | Amazon UK
Clara moves from place to place, with only Joanie (her Raise hummingbird) for company. Sal is a robot who runs a tea shop in memory of her owner. Then Clara pops into Sal’s place during her lunch break.
There’s some interesting worldbuilding in the story. Humanoid robots were banned from production, due to worries about them being able to learn and become full people. Instead, people have Raises – robotic animal companions who are intelligent and have personalities, but can’t learn and adapt the way a robot could. Robots like Sal are in a difficult place, where society doesn’t know quite what to do in terms of rights. Sal has outlived the company who made her, so spare parts are increasingly an issue, and her memory is failing.
The novella focuses on Clara, Sal and Joanie, giving space for their relationships to develop. I liked that Joanie really doesn’t change, because she’s not able to without being re-programmed, as a contrast to both Clara and Sal. In the case of the latter two, their first meeting isn’t perfect. Clara knows she shouldn’t treat Sal as a novelty, with all the being-an-object that implies, but does it anyway out of surprise. She also realises how hurtful that reaction would be to Sal.
They get over that initial awkwardness, and continue to get closer as Clara regularly visits the tea shop. Sometimes Clara brings Raises she’s repairing for work, and eventually Sal trusts her enough to do the needed repair work. Both have things they’re not ready to face. For Sal, it’s the obvious one of her owner’s death and continuing to run the tea shop because she always has. For Clara, her wandering is something she picked up due to growing up in a migrant worker family. They moved where the jobs were. Even though she doesn’t need to do that anymore, she moves from habit, rather than considering what she really wants.
It touches on issues of power imbalances in relationships. As much as Sal loved her owner, it doesn’t change that she was owned. Her owner’s name is coded into her, and that registration of an owner prevents her from being able to move on. Clara realises this isn’t something she should change without permission, but also that ownership is a problem. No one’s name should be in that field. As much as people may talk about belonging to each other in romances, it’s meant metaphorically, not as a literal thing that someone has no choice over.
This is an asexual romance. There’s some intimacy though cuddling, generally being close and Sal trusting Clara to work on her systems. There isn’t any sex, and the couple discuss that they’re not interested in that. It’s nice to see a focus on finding out what a partner is comfortable doing, rather than a focus on pressuring a partner to do things anyway.
What I didn’t find so believable was the social worldbuilding. Sal was several centuries old. Things might have advanced in robotics, but there weren’t really other signs that this society had gone through a few centuries. Things like gender roles and fashion were stuck much as they are today. I’d also have expected more impact from people having Raises, as social spaces would need a redesign to accommodate many people having a robotic pet.
[A copy of this book was received from the publisher for review purposes]
3 thoughts on “The Cybernetic Tea Shop – Meredith Katz”
Is Clara asexual and does she use the term to describe herself? I’m just curious because… robots don’t count as asexual rep, and a relationship without sex doesn’t exactly count as asexual rep either. The story sounds adorable otherwise, I just kind of … *squints* this doesn’t sound like asexual representation to me.
Clara doesn’t use the term asexual. My judgement is because of her thoughts and her discussion with Sal. It’s clear she falls in love without being sexually attracted to partners, because she directly says that’s the case. It’s how she views all people, not because Sal is a robot.
I realise asexual romances could have sexual content and sexual romances could have none. The previous asexual romance I reviewed did have sexual content, for example. I mention it so people can judge if it’s something that’ll interest them, rather than using that to decide on character identity. So what I’m trying to say here is, “This is an asexual romance where they don’t have sex,” as opposed to, “This is an asexual romance where they do have sex.” Hopefully that’s a bit clearer.
Thanks for the answer! I know it’s difficult to find asexual characters, since they’re usually not advertised on the tin. 🙂
Comments are closed.